Skip to main content

Johnny Isakson held a telephone town hall yesterday.  He says he voted against anything that would run up the national debt.  He didn't mention that he asked for funds from the stimulus after he voted against it. He advocated a balanced budget law like in Georgia, well, except in case of war, of course! He claimed Reagan inherited a big debt and only spent a little.

He defended MediCare (said he's within 90 days of signing up) and the VA ("I'm happy to tell you the president's proposed legislation carves out and protects veterans' health care" and the "goal is to see to it that there's not a veteran in the state more than 45 minutes from a clinic").  But providing similar care to the rest of us? That would cost too much!

A senior citizen asks what about "you hear on the TV and on the Internet" that they're going to "take away from us what we already have and distribute it equally among all the others"?

Isakson answers (paraphrased except where in quotation marks):

The president's plan raises deficit $1.3T over 3 years.  There's only one way to reduce cost of Medicare: reduce reimbursements to physicians.  "You and I know" that doctors already won't take Medicare payments because they're too low.  That's a "wrongheaded direction to take" because it "hurts those who do have it to the benefit of those who don't".  But he's "completely empathetic and concerned just as you are".

How ironic is that empathy, after the Sotomayer confirmation hearings?

Also ironic after the previous 8 years, in response to a question about the "czars" talking point, Isakson says he wants a balance among the three branches of government.

Isakson claimed a thousand people attended his previous telecon and he expected as many on this one, but his most local recent in-person town hall was much smaller and was not announced in advance.  Methinks he exaggerates.

The telephone town hall was not announced in advance, either.  I live in a largely R area, and his office called me.

Contrast this with Sanford Bishop's (D) GA-02 Health Care Town Hall in Albany, GA which drew upwards of 500 because Bishop advertised it in advance.

Isakson practically recited from Jack Kingston's pie chart:

"To solve the problems of 14% of the population, you shouldn't put at risk the rest...."

He didn't call it by name, but that's what he was using.

I didn't hear him say "recision" once.  However, somebody asked him about pre-existing conditions.  He's recommended raising the size of the risk pool by "tearing down barriers between states".  Which without anything else will just let big insurers get bigger.

Isakson mischaracterized reconciliation ("the one bill that doesn't require cloture") as "the nuclear option" when it's not the same as what Cheney threatened, which was to change the rules of the Senate, while reconciliation is part of the rules now.  Ignoring the facts, Isakson said reconciliation "Breaks with the tradition of the Senate, the reason the Senate exists, to make sure there's debate" and we "don't need a runaway train on health care."

It wasn't all health care.  A caller asked about CO2 cap and trade.

A: Huge potential consequences for Georgia businesses and people.  "European system where the government establishes the maximum amount of greenhouse gases a business can emit" can trade to get below.  "creating a carbon tax" It would cost Ga. ratepayers between now and 2020 $8.2 billion It's a "costly idea for the rank and file citizens of Georgia".  He did recommend biofuels, wind, and solar, plus of course drilling on the continental shelf, instead of "destroying manufacturing in this country".

Er, didn't we already do cap and trade to get rid of acid rain? Were we Europe then? I guess so, and we should all line up in ranks and file along now.

Water is a big issue in Georgia, largely because Atlanta can't be bothered to reserve or conserve.  Someone asks about water.  Isakson thinks a solution is near about the rivers and the 3 states (Georgia, Alabama, Florida) that a judge said had to agree before any of them could take more water.  He mentioned riparian rights, as in boating and fishing.  It didn't seem to me he really said anything.

Here's an issue where I've pretty much got to agree with him, since it's a bill roundly loathed by right and left, and for much the same reasons: H.R. 2749, the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009, which recently passed the House.

Q: The questioner says the bill includes good things such as food origin labelling.  Also establishes inspection on foreign foods.  But also has items very detrimental to small farmers "such as my husband and I.  We're beekeepers.  It would tax our bees around $500 for raw agricultural commodities."

A: Isakson reminds us that "agriculture is the biggest business in Georgia." He says that partly because of the recent salmonella outbreak, which he says started in south Georgia, there's been a big move to improve food safety.  He says food inspections operate under the FDA, which does spot inspections but they're only complaint-oriented.

Isakson says the problem in the bill is taxes and fees put on food operators; additional financial burden.  Isakson says he is a co-sponsor with Chambliss of a Senate Bill to force the Chinese and others to certify their food at point of origin before it leaves their country.

Isakson again referred to the "unfortunate salmonella outbreak" and points to Peanut Corporation of America.  He says it was not an accident; PCA had tests before they shipped that showed salmonella, yet continued to retest until they got one false negative, then they shipped.  He says that was criminal, and should be prosecuted.

"I understand the burden of fees on you, and what that can do to the small farmer or the small business person."

He reiterated his point about making China and southeast Asia raise the standard of their inspections.  He said nothing in favor of food origin labelling.

OK, a Republican is anti-tax; no surprise, and in this case I even agree with him.  But I don't see how making China do better food labelling would help with problems like the PCA one.  What about encouraging local food production instead?
And what about better food origin labelling, maybe down to the state and county level? If it's good enough for French wines why not for Georgia carrots? Georgia is the #2 U.S. producer of carrots, but nobody knows that.

There were more questions, but this is enough to get the flavor.

The good news is Isakson's Senate seat is up next year, and is contested, by one Republican, two Democrats, and a Libertarian.  The only one I've met is Mike Thurmond, an attorney who has been a state representative and who is currently state Labor Commissioner, aka "perhaps the smartest politician in the Georgia Democratic Party."GA minority leader DuBose Porter calls Thurmond "the best stump speaker in politics today in Georgia."

PS: For those who get Civil War Tourette's at any mention of the south, there's no need to comment, just check the last poll item.  And if you can stop the twitching long enough, read this. For those with the slightly lesser affliction of Atlanta Tourette's, which occurs at any mention of Georgia, the second from last item is for you.  Bless your little hearts!

Originally posted to jayskew on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 09:17 AM PDT.


Health care in America?

9%4 votes
2%1 votes
16%7 votes
32%14 votes
9%4 votes
2%1 votes
11%5 votes
2%1 votes
0%0 votes
13%6 votes

| 43 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (13+ / 0-)

    "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." --Hypatia of Alexandria, c.400

    by jayskew on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 09:17:58 AM PDT

  •  I guess the obvious question.... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    RunawayRose, devtob, jayskew whether he got any death-panel questions.  He's one of only two Republicans to deny the smear, along with Lisa Murtkowski, so I'd be interested to know how he would deal with it in this setting.

    For a Georgia Republican Senator named Johnny, he doesn't seem too bad.  

    Al que no le guste el caldo, le dan dos tazas.

    by Rich in PA on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 09:27:19 AM PDT

    •  I didn't hear any, but (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      RunawayRose, cosette, dle2GA

      they got around to calling my number after he started, so I can't say for sure.
      However, elsewhere Isakson has said talk about death panels is "nuts":
      Yet he also went out of his way to distance himself from any hint of being involved in writing the current health care bill:

      Even Jack Kingston denies that death panels exist:
      Of course, that buys Kingston credibility on Bill Maher's show so he can later bring up more flag pin type slurs.

      Isakson is slicker than Saxby (the other Georgia Senator) and sounds more rational.  Which means he can convince more people to vote against their best interests.

      Elect Mike Thurmond in 2010.

      "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." --Hypatia of Alexandria, c.400

      by jayskew on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 09:39:40 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I hate to say it (0+ / 0-)

    but ole Johnny will win big time next year.  He will shamelessly change any position to get the RW vote like on choice and immigration.  Whatever the big issue mis next year in the election, you can bet Johnny will be right where his base is.  

    Obama would be perfect if he were a Cubs fan.

    by Georgia Liberal on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 09:58:04 AM PDT

  •  "let big insurers get bigger" (0+ / 0-)

    The big insurers are already huge.  Ever notice how in any big city, the insurance companies own the tallest buildings?

    The argument for allowing interstate competition among insurance companies is that only very large companies can navigate the 51 sets of regulators and mandates that currently exist.  This prevents small companies from expanding or new, possibly innovative, companies from entering the market.

    Results count for more than intentions do.

    by VA Classical Liberal on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 10:02:48 AM PDT

  •  Isakson and Chambliss are also my (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    senators.  Neither of them will vote for hc reform that will help the people, but will willingly vote for any policies putting more money into the hands of corporatists.  Along with these two, I have conservadem Jim "I oppose all of the hcr bills in Congress" Marshall.  They keep being re-elected in spite of being "cardboard cutouts" occupying seats in Congress on behalf of GA.  

    •  was also on a Saxby telecon, but (0+ / 0-)

      it was entirely talking points and scare stories and how he was fighting the good fight for conservatives.  There was so little actual content it was too depressing to write up.

      This Isakson diary is in the interests of knowing the opposition.
      Same reason as covering Kingston's town hall in Valdosta, although there we were able to speak up and get press:

      For a brighter spot, see my diary on Sanford Bishop's health care town hall in Albany:

      "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." --Hypatia of Alexandria, c.400

      by jayskew on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 11:36:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site