Skip to main content

There's a little New Year's ritual I do. Before midnight, I write on two pieces of paper: one lists all I wish to leave behind in the old year, the other all that I hope will manifest in the new year. Before the old year ends, I burn the first paper down to ash and discard it. After the clock strikes, I do whatever will anchor my desires most firmly in the new year: sometimes I've burned that paper too, releasing the ashes on the wind; other times, I've saved it along with other objects embodying my intentions, returning to them during the year to refresh myself.

I have plenty of wishes for myself, chiefly true love and enough money to buy a few months of my own time to finish my new book, which is demanding to be born, and which I know can have real impact.

But like so many people, my wish for our nation Occupies a lot of mental disk space.

I am so grateful to have witnessed the uprising of conscience and refusal to submit to illegitimate demands (whether from public- or private-sector tyrants) that has swept the planet since the Arab Spring commenced, nearly a year ago. And so challenged to find a way that such formidable energies can now be directed into constructing a new reality of justice tempered by love. Even if all that Occupy were to accomplish was to open a space of public discourse about things that had so often been deemed taboo before—the polarization of wealth, the abuse of corporate power, the imprisonment of democracy in a cage of gold—that would be enough.

But still, I want more.

This week, I spoke at length with a friend in publishing, who is contemplating a series of practical books on topics like consensus decision-making, thinking they may be of use to the emergent movement. This is one of the topics I know quite a bit about. My 2004 essay, "Don't Do It: Organizational Suicide Prevention for Progressives" focuses on key issues that are still relevant, I think. For example:

[O]ften, progressives are so suspicious of structures of constituted authority that they have been willing to forego continuity and growth to inoculate themselves against the charge of power-mongering. These attitudes are not altogether unfamiliar to a 60s-era activist like myself, but I find their persistence dismaying. To be fair, I suppose it could be said that the escalation of such suspicion in the last four decades has been proportionate to growth in the abuse of power and authority in both government and commerce. But bending over backwards to avoid the sins of power, progressives tumble to the ground. Those without a positive image of power wielded in the service of freedom and justice are certain never to have any real-world power with which to be tempted.

How can we embody positive power? What can we rally around? As I wrote in the previous essay of this series, Annals of the Culture of Politics:

I’m convinced that one policy change can be the uniquely powerful lever to unleash the cascade of needed changes: getting private money completely out of the public electoral process, depriving entrenched interests of their primary instrument of public-sector control, the ability to dominate elections and legislative processes with money.

But I am told by a friend who works with progressive political donors and campaigns that this idea is deemed too abstract—too much about process rather than outcomes—to gain traction with a movement grounded in direct action.

I would really like that to be wrong, and so would Michael Moore, whose entire ten-point program for Occupy is well worth consdering. (It was rejected by the group charged with a "vision statement," evidently on the grounds noted, above, a kneejerk refusal to be influenced, for fear of co-optation).

Moore is not my guru, but he's hit it on the head lately, and I join him wholeheartedly in the conviction that getting private money out of the electoral process is the linchpin for any meaningful reform of our political system or economy.

Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ted Deutch have created companion amendments to the U.S. Constitution with key steps to help bring this about. (I'd like to see total public financing, which would be even more of a change, but this would help a great deal.)

No matter how corrupt the system, we the people still have constitutional rights to free speech and assembly, and access to a full array of tools to bring about democratic change. My New Year's wish is for this change—divorcing money from politics—which can make possible a resurgent American democracy that brings the spirt of the streets into the statehouse. I don't know with certainty that people will succeed in resurrecting true democracy if corporate wealth's enormous thumb is removed from the scale; but without that change, I am deeply skeptical.

Happy New Year, everyone! May we all have reason to rejoice in the coming year. And just to be sure we start out as we mean to go on, eye candy!

Look in the mirror on this last day of the year. Gaze into your own eyes:

and all my instincts, they return
and the grand facade, so soon will burn
without a noise, without my pride
I reach out from the inside

in your eyes
the light the heat
in your eyes
I am complete
in your eyes
I see the doorway to a thousand churches
in your eyes
the resolution of all the fruitless searches
in your eyes

Peter Gabriel's great song, "In Your Eyes," a delicious duet with Youssou N'Dour.

SUBSCRIBE FREE or post comments at

Originally posted to arlenegoldbard on Sat Dec 31, 2011 at 10:53 AM PST.

Also republished by These Green Mountains.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site